The government has amended the election rules to prevent public inspection of certain electronic documents, including CCTV cameras and webcasting footage, as well as video recordings of candidates, to prevent their misuse. The Union Law Ministry on Friday amended Rule 93(2)(a) of the Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961, on the recommendation of the Election Commission (EC).
Previously, all election-related “papers” were available for public examination. The change includes the language “as specified in these rules,” which restricts access to documents that are explicitly referenced, such as nomination forms, election agent appointments, results, and election account statements.
This list does not include electronic records such as CCTV footage or webcasting clips. This adjustment is in response to an Election Commission (EC) proposal and is intended to avoid the exploitation of sensitive data while still protecting voter secrecy. EC officials warned that using CCTV footage from inside polling booths could jeopardise voter confidentiality.
The modification has generated criticism from opposition parties, with Congress national secretary Jairam Ramesh challenging the EC’s commitment to transparency and suggesting preparations to challenge it in court. Candidates and their agents will continue to have access to all statutory documents as required by law.
- Amendment to Rules 93:
The amendment states that only specific records, such as nomination papers, results, and election expense reports, will be available for public scrutiny. Previously, all election-related “papers” were available. - Electronic Records Exclusion:
The new laws prevent public access to electronic records such as CCTV footage, webcasting videos, and video recordings of candidates during elections. This is intended to protect sensitive data and maintain voter confidentiality. - Reason for the Change:
The Election Commission (EC) proposed the adjustment to address concerns about the misuse of electronic records, which could jeopardise voter privacy and election integrity. - Criticism:
Critics argue that the new limits may reduce transparency. Several political groups want to challenge the reforms in court.
